Trumps animosity shows sign letting
![trumps animosity shows sign letting trumps animosity shows sign letting](http://yoninetanyahu.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/to-pail-krigman-from-alina-mastenkoa-dn-ajay-mishra-cc-bill-clinton-NO-FRENCH-U-R-WRONG.-ONLY-JAY-IS-PERFECT-WHAT-DO-U-HINK-BIG-DOG-AND-UNCLE-JOE.jpg)
The problems now being faced primarily, but not exclusively, in the US are ideological, relatively recent in origin, and transmitted through mechanisms that were not and could not have been foreseen by the founding fathers. Neither Sachs nor Fukuyama, however, provide convincing arguments that the US Constitution provides an adequate defence against the Trumpian assault on evidence, sound policy, and the established US-directed liberal world order. More recently, like Sachs, he has urged a return to constitutionalism and the rule of law as answers to the threat of identity politics posed by Trump and his ilk. A strong opposition to Trump’s ‘America-first’ agenda is vital, but I am not persuaded that we can trust the strength of the US Constitution to steer us through Trump’s onslaught on reason and evidence-based debate Others, particularly Francis Fukuyama, in his 2014 Foreign Affairs article and book, have recognized that the US system’s inherent distrust of the executive branch of government gives rise to major risks of disharmony and conflict. “uch,” he says, “will depend on the performance of America’s constitutional order.” These dangers and the democratic response seem likely to be realized in some form, and certainly we must hope that congressional controls prevail. Jefferey Sachs warns of the dangers emerging from the Trump presidency because of his extreme temperament and the now certain opposition from the Democratic House following the mid-term elections. That approach succeeded once, with the 2017 corporate tax cut, because big Republican donors insisted on the measure, but it failed with Trump’s attempt to repeal Obamacare, as three Republican senators balked. The first has been to rely on the Republican majorities in the two houses of Congress to pass legislation in the face of strong popular opposition. Trump has tried to implement his radical agenda using three approaches.
![trumps animosity shows sign letting trumps animosity shows sign letting](http://yoninetanyahu.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/IN-OTHER-WORDS-HOPE-TO-LUCKNOW-IS-404.jpg)
At the same time, contrary to Trump’s relentless promotion of fossil fuels (coal, oil, and gas), the public favors investments in renewable energy and remaining in the Paris climate agreement.
![trumps animosity shows sign letting trumps animosity shows sign letting](http://yoninetanyahu.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/IT-SAYS-LOOK-AT-THIS-DOG-BUT-THEN-ALL-I-SEE-IS-FRENCH-OAPER-COMPANY-WHATS-UP.jpg)
The public opposed last year’s Republican-backed corporate tax cut, Trump’s effort to repeal the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare), his proposed border wall with Mexico, the decision to withdraw from the Iran nuclear agreement, and the imposition of tariff increases on China, Europe, and others. None of Trump’s extremist policy ideas has received public support. Yet Trump’s rising frustrations could push him over the edge psychologically, with potentially harrowing consequences for American democracy and the world. So far the answer has been no, and the midterm elections make it far less likely. NEW YORK – The drama of Donald Trump’s presidency has centered around whether an extremist president would be able to carry out an extremist policy agenda against the will of the majority of Americans.